
Created on 2008-02-07 17:00:36.
2008-02-07
- nathalie: 15:30:14
- hi
- paula vélez: 15:30:21
- hi
- nathalie: 15:30:54
- j'ai vu que tu as lu le script
- nathalie: 15:31:00
- si tu as des questions
- nathalie: 15:31:12
- ou je peux également en parler
- paula vélez: 15:31:13
- j'y suis, j'ai du mal a comprendre... mais je vais y arriver
- nathalie: 15:31:30
- le chat avec manuel est en ligne aussi et peut t'aider
- nathalie: 15:32:06
- chat with manuel and nathalie about the script is here: http://1904.cc/~aether/CMYK_imal/cmyk_chat_080206.html
- paula vélez: 15:32:10
- piochage? c'est quoi?
- nathalie: 15:32:24
- on va commencer par le début
- nathalie: 15:32:30
- 3 personnages
- nathalie: 15:32:35
- et 2 invités
- paula vélez: 15:32:37
- ok
- paula vélez: 15:32:40
- oui
- nathalie: 15:32:47
- 3 chharacters and 2 online guests
- nathalie: 15:33:01
- 2 guests will have a list by act
- nathalie: 15:33:06
- a html list
- nathalie: 15:33:21
- where they will pick a symbol of intensity by act
- nathalie: 15:33:37
- each duration of act is 4min.
- nathalie: 15:33:50
- so duration of the perfiormance is 20 min.
- nathalie: 15:34:29
- 2 texts frames in the global html interface (audience see)
- nathalie: 15:34:47
- frames 5 & 8
- nathalie: 15:34:55
- in frame 5 :
- nathalie: 15:35:34
- us (you for example) pull a act with the title of the act
- paula vélez: 15:36:12
- je dois prendre un acte avec le titre?
- nathalie: 15:36:20
- you must follow the duration in order to choose in the list (other html interface list ) the act
- paula vélez: 15:36:23
- comprends pas cette phrase
- nathalie: 15:36:36
- this list will built by manuel
- nathalie: 15:36:52
- so you need only to choose acte I, II, III, IV, V
- nathalie: 15:36:55
- in this order
- nathalie: 15:37:01
- and follow the time
- nathalie: 15:37:04
- then
- paula vélez: 15:37:04
- ok
- paula vélez: 15:37:24
- so, i'm supose to be who?
- paula vélez: 15:37:35
- the heart? (h)
- nathalie: 15:37:37
- the guests can know when he/she begin to play
- paula vélez: 15:37:43
- the pick?
- nathalie: 15:37:52
- :)
- nathalie: 15:37:53
- no
- paula vélez: 15:37:56
- ahhaha
- paula vélez: 15:38:02
- so who
- ideacritik: 15:38:11
- ola. ok im here reading now to catch up.
- nathalie: 15:38:11
- you choose all the acts following duration
- paula vélez: 15:38:28
- the good luck symbol then... hihhi
- nathalie: 15:38:35
- 2 guests - friends of us - not performes of aether
- paula vélez: 15:38:50
- ok
- nathalie: 15:38:59
- so
- nathalie: 15:39:04
- in frame 5:
- nathalie: 15:39:22
- texts will be : number of act with her title
- nathalie: 15:39:41
- automatic when you decide to take in the list
- nathalie: 15:39:46
- 4min by act
- ideacritik: 15:40:05
- le script en online? ...
- nathalie: 15:40:10
- acte I : the meeting
- nathalie: 15:40:19
- acte II : exchanges
- nathalie: 15:40:25
- act III... etc..
- nathalie: 15:40:51
- manuel must programm that to have online html yes
- nathalie: 15:41:26
- ok
- nathalie: 15:41:29
- now
- nathalie: 15:41:39
- the other frame with text:
- nathalie: 15:41:42
- the frame 8
- nathalie: 15:41:54
- it's the frame of the guests
- nathalie: 15:42:10
- their choice in order to choose a action inside a same act
- nathalie: 15:42:12
- so
- nathalie: 15:42:18
- 2 guests
- nathalie: 15:42:24
- for exemple:
- nathalie: 15:42:40
- guest 1 : act I & act III  
- nathalie: 15:42:59
- guest 2 : act II & act IV & act V  
- nathalie: 15:43:15
- in each act:
- nathalie: 15:43:28
- 4 actions
- nathalie: 15:43:39
- 4 symbol-intensity
- nathalie: 15:44:05
- so during 4min. the guest can decide to repeat a same intensity
- nathalie: 15:44:15
- but alternate with other intensity
- nathalie: 15:44:24
- so he/she create a rythm
- nathalie: 15:44:35
- he/she will write the play
- nathalie: 15:45:56
- other frames : 1, 3, 3, 4 and 6
- nathalie: 15:46:04
- are performers
- nathalie: 15:46:37
- for each frames of performance one point of view camera fixed
- nathalie: 15:46:45
- frame 1: front view
- nathalie: 15:46:57
- frame 2: zoom view (details about gestures)
- ideacritik: 15:47:11
- so for the guest performers we keep on fixed camera postion the whole time?
- nathalie: 15:48:02
- the 2 guests active only the frame 8: this frame is only a text
- nathalie: 15:49:09
- frame 3: low-angle shot
- ideacritik: 15:49:11
- je comprend pas tres bien... on ne fait que du text?
- nathalie: 15:49:36
- frame 5 & 8 : texts
- nathalie: 15:49:41
- other frames is performance
- ideacritik: 15:49:49
- (les frames sont disposes comment ?)
- paula vélez: 15:49:54
- moi aussi, je dois être un peu bête, mais j'ai du mal a comprendre (sweat)
- nathalie: 15:49:55
- i' m describing the point of view of the camera
- nathalie: 15:50:27
- audrey can you download the stage and scenario in the website?
- nathalie: 15:50:33
- because all is indicate
- ideacritik: 15:50:34
- what frames do the remote performers have?
- nathalie: 15:50:47
- read some lines before here
- paula vélez: 15:50:55
- ok
- ideacritik: 15:51:01
- im reading scenario - onlline - but stage i msut find
- paula vélez: 15:51:10
- i'm reading slowly again
- nathalie: 15:51:19
- other frames : 1, 3, 3, 4 and 6
15:46
are performers
15:46
for each frames of performance one point of view camera fixed
15:46
- ideacritik: 15:51:41
- ahah! i have stage now...
- nathalie: 15:51:49
- ok
- nathalie: 15:53:03
- frame 1: front view
15:46
frame 2: zoom view (details about gestures)
frame 3: low-angle shot
frame 4: 3/4 view
frame 6: zenital view (high angle shot) - ideacritik: 15:53:36
- ce que je ne comprends pas - c'est qu'il y a que deux online performers - mais la case 1,2,3, 4 et 6 ont la possibilitie de online performer... donc on change de case occasionellement?
- paula vélez: 15:53:47
- alors, si je participe, je serai à ce moment le frame 1 ou le frame 3, n'est pas?
- nathalie: 15:54:17
- frames 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 performers
frames 5, 8 texts
frames 7,9 mirror ascii of frame 1 & 3 (automatic) - paula vélez: 15:54:41
- ok
- nathalie: 15:55:04
- now i don't know Luucy wanted to participate some weeks ago .. but she is not here and she don't reply about rehearsals..
- nathalie: 15:55:11
- so you can take 1 or 3
- nathalie: 15:55:14
- and audrey too
- ideacritik: 15:55:24
- lucy is here
- nathalie: 15:55:25
- you can choose what you want
- paula vélez: 15:55:27
- alors, les deux Online performers seront toujours visibles sur 4 frames le 1,3,7,9
- ideacritik: 15:55:31
- but must be invited to the chat...
- ideacritik: 15:55:39
- does anyone know her 'nic'?
- nathalie: 15:55:52
- i don't have the skype name of her
- ideacritik: 15:56:02
- ok i just asked her via email
- ideacritik: 15:56:09
- so hopefully we can get her soon...
- nathalie: 15:56:42
- frame 1 mirror frame 7
- nathalie: 15:56:48
- frame 3 mirror frame 9
- nathalie: 15:56:52
- not all the time
- nathalie: 15:57:10
- depends what happens in the acts
- nathalie: 15:57:27
- act I : frames 1, 2 & 4
- paula vélez: 15:57:28
- ok
- nathalie: 15:57:40
- act II : frames 1, 2 & 4
- nathalie: 15:57:59
- act III : 2, 3 & 6
- paula vélez: 15:58:05
- so, audrey tu voudras quel frame?
- nathalie: 15:58:09
- act IV : 3 & 6
- paula vélez: 15:58:15
- 1 ou 3?
- nathalie: 15:58:17
- act V : 3 & 4
- ideacritik: 15:58:17
- but frame 2,4 and 6 - are they for both online and IMAL performers? i mean - during the performance it will switch from one to the other right? like you said we choose only certain acts to perform not all?
- ideacritik: 15:58:32
- me - i don't mind what frame ... whichever
- nathalie: 15:58:33
- yes
- nathalie: 15:58:51
- frames 2, 4 & 6 are in the spot (iMAL) and online
- ideacritik: 15:58:53
- so i'm : nathalie
15:43
act IV : 3 & 6 - paula vélez: 15:58:57
- ok so i'll take 3rd frame
- ideacritik: 15:59:26
- wait i just made this complicated...
- ideacritik: 15:59:50
- just give me a frame and which act... less complicated.
- nathalie: 16:00:13
- ok paula = frame 3
- nathalie: 16:00:22
- audrey = frame 1
- ideacritik: 16:00:33
- ok! now do i act during all acts?
- ideacritik: 16:00:38
- or just some...
- nathalie: 16:00:40
- see the scenario audrey
- nathalie: 16:01:12
- frame 1 'll play in act I and act II
- ideacritik: 16:02:18
- oui je vois.
- ideacritik: 16:02:34
- takes a bit of time ... but im starting to get it :)
- nathalie: 16:02:41
- during an act where you play you must follow the text in the frame 5 and 8
- ideacritik: 16:02:59
- so i am frontal view, black and white, act 1&2
- nathalie: 16:03:14
- the frame 5 : text explain what act we play (number of the act + title)
- ideacritik: 16:03:26
- ok
- nathalie: 16:03:47
- the frame 8 : text are keywords and symbol of intensity
- paula vélez: 16:03:57
- so, in act I and II frame 3 must be white?
- nathalie: 16:04:07
- in order to have a mnemotic memory about ambiance, intensity of the play
- ideacritik: 16:04:17
- ok
- ideacritik: 16:04:29
- what is 'online piochage?"
- nathalie: 16:04:41
- and because is more simple to reaad keywords
- ideacritik: 16:04:46
- yes indeed
- ideacritik: 16:04:53
- good idea!
- nathalie: 16:05:20
- in the frame 8: text = 2 guests pick in a list for each act
- ideacritik: 16:05:49
- hum this i do not understand...
- nathalie: 16:06:07
- the frame 8
15:41
it's the frame of the guests
15:42
their choice in order to choose a action inside a same act
15:42
so
15:42
2 guests
15:42
for exemple:
15:42
guest 1 : act I & act III
15:42
guest 2 : act II & act IV & act V
15:43
in each act:
15:43
4 actions
15:43
4 symbol-intensity
15:44
so during 4min. the guest can decide to repeat a same intensity
15:44
but alternate with other intensity - nathalie: 16:06:46
- now i found already 1 guest
- ideacritik: 16:06:46
- and who are these guests?
- ideacritik: 16:06:51
- ok not us...
- nathalie: 16:06:52
- we need to have another guest
- ideacritik: 16:06:53
- got it...
- laure.dit: 16:06:57
- hi
- nathalie: 16:06:59
- so ig some of you know someone
- nathalie: 16:07:02
- ..
- ideacritik: 16:07:02
- en personne - nott remote right/
- ideacritik: 16:07:09
- hi laure
- nathalie: 16:07:09
- yes not us
- ideacritik: 16:07:20
- but live - not remote?
- nathalie: 16:07:25
- we can begin to include guests outside..
- ideacritik: 16:07:45
- you mean remotely?
- nathalie: 16:07:46
- hi
- ideacritik: 16:08:00
- like not on location in brussels or?
- paula vélez: 16:08:03
- Hola laure
- nathalie: 16:08:25
- online guests
- ideacritik: 16:08:43
- ahah. ok...
- ideacritik: 16:08:52
- but laure are you performing also?
- nathalie: 16:08:53
- manuel must built a interface text for the guests
- paula vélez: 16:09:15
- les fringues... how we are going to be dress
- cym: 16:09:27
- Judy wants to join the chat, but she doesn't know what's wrong....
- nathalie: 16:09:28
- in iMAL we need to be 2 by stage : assistance + performer
- ideacritik: 16:09:37
- cym: what is her skype id?
- cym: 16:09:59
- Nylon
- nathalie: 16:10:01
- yes i sent her a invitation but i have not authorization..
- ideacritik: 16:10:11
- sorry laure - of coures - its chloe who wrote to list... excuses
- cym: 16:10:16
- but here it says that she is in the chat and i cannot add here again
- paula vélez: 16:10:17
- she has to change her privacy settings fixed it up
- paula vélez: 16:10:27
- judy change your privacy settings
- nathalie: 16:10:37
- she must authorize me to add in the chat
- cym: 16:10:38
- she cannot read you, she is not in the chat
- ideacritik: 16:10:51
- i cannot find any 'nylon'
- nathalie: 16:10:52
- i try to sent again
- nathalie: 16:11:22
- ok i sent her if she can give me auhtorization..
- nathalie: 16:11:27
- she must recieve now
- nathalie: 16:12:10
- Nylon skype name is paljudy
- cym: 16:12:23
- sorry ideakritik, skypename is paljudy
- ideacritik: 16:12:34
- ah!
- laure.dit: 16:12:59
- cant get nylon in neither
- ideacritik: 16:13:45
- yes!!!
- ideacritik: 16:13:49
- she's in!!
- laure.dit: 16:13:54
- good- re-hi judy !
- paula vélez: 16:14:05
- yeah!
- paula vélez: 16:14:06
- hola!
- nathalie: 16:14:11
- hi
- ideacritik: 16:14:18
- sorry judy that took a while....
- cym: 16:14:52
- how did you do that?
- Nylon: 16:15:09
- Good...
- paula vélez: 16:15:25
- good... not god
- laure.dit: 16:15:29
- to nath : i didnt know that chloe wouldnt be there (in bruxel) that means for noy we are only 4 live performer- i will try to engage one or two friends- are you thinking of anybody ?
- paula vélez: 16:15:30
- God
- ideacritik: 16:15:31
- i ctrl (or right) clicked on the 'aether CMYK) in the chatters list on left
- ideacritik: 16:15:40
- then add user.
- nathalie: 16:15:44
- ok laure
- nathalie: 16:15:53
- yes i read the mail of chloe
- nathalie: 16:15:54
- np
- ideacritik: 16:16:19
- but chloe could be a guest - or me a guest and her a performer...
- nathalie: 16:16:27
- so maybe she can have responsability of the frame 5 ?
- laure.dit: 16:16:29
- yes
- nathalie: 16:16:44
- text about act
- Nylon: 16:16:56
- It just dropped from connected to 12 to only 1......there is An issue but I am following now
- nathalie: 16:16:59
- in this order act I, II, III, IV and V
- nathalie: 16:17:04
- 4 min by act
- nathalie: 16:17:13
- automatic list manuel must do
- nathalie: 16:17:30
- she know already used in beckett perf.
- nathalie: 16:17:54
- list of five act she must follow the time
- nathalie: 16:18:11
- the indication is important for the us and online guests
- nathalie: 16:18:30
- the guests know then when begin and finish a act
- nathalie: 16:19:05
- inside a act guests can choose then symbol-intensity he/she want
- paula vélez: 16:19:13
- unfortunaly i must go in 40 minutes. so. let's be very practical to advance ... later i could read the post i lost
- paula vélez: 16:19:18
- i loose
- nathalie: 16:19:22
- the frame 8: guests
- nathalie: 16:19:31
- text
- nathalie: 16:19:42
- 5 list one by act
- nathalie: 16:19:45
- inside
- nathalie: 16:19:54
- 4 actions of different intensity
- nathalie: 16:20:07
- so when he/she choose/pick a symbol
- nathalie: 16:20:28
- keywords appear in the frame 8 with the symbol of intensity
- nathalie: 16:20:36
- so easy for us performers to know
- nathalie: 16:20:42
- and for audience to follox
- nathalie: 16:20:46
- *follow
- paula vélez: 16:20:52
- if i understand, guest will be directors of intensity
- nathalie: 16:20:59
- exactly
- nathalie: 16:21:02
- they give the tempo
- nathalie: 16:21:07
- the rythm
- paula vélez: 16:21:19
- so we must read carfully on line direction in frames below
- ideacritik: 16:21:20
- aha - so we have to be ready to perform each action/intensity
- nathalie: 16:21:22
- and will write our play
- nathalie: 16:21:40
- yes we need to repeat that
- paula vélez: 16:21:42
- like a interaction game
- ideacritik: 16:21:45
- i hope this will not happen in too quick succession or this will be difficult to follow
- paula vélez: 16:21:52
- they will play with us
- nathalie: 16:22:04
- yes interaction play-game
- nathalie: 16:22:12
- like a game of cards
- nathalie: 16:22:20
- but with rules
- nathalie: 16:22:33
- rules: this control of the time we have for each act
- paula vélez: 16:22:35
- so the camera is fixe in one only point of view (frame3 for example contre ploné)
- nathalie: 16:22:38
- in the frame 5
- nathalie: 16:22:44
- so yes
- paula vélez: 16:22:45
- plongé
- ideacritik: 16:22:45
- does it have to be a person in the frame or can it be a drawing/image... etc animationm?
- nathalie: 16:22:58
- for each frames in 1, 2, 3, 4, 6
- nathalie: 16:23:05
- a point of view fix
- nathalie: 16:23:21
- the camera point of view
- nathalie: 16:24:11
- it's more a different point of view for each frames playing in same time
- nathalie: 16:24:13
- so
- nathalie: 16:24:23
- another point of view of the action
- nathalie: 16:24:30
- described in the stage
- nathalie: 16:24:40
- camera points of view
- paula vélez: 16:24:41
- analisa
- nathalie: 16:24:58
- hi analisa
- ideacritik: 16:25:10
- nathalie: does it have to be a person in the frame or can it be a drawing/image... etc animationm?
- ana-lisa: 16:25:26
- HI
- nathalie: 16:25:27
- frame 1: front view
- nathalie: 16:25:33
- ok
- nathalie: 16:25:41
- i don't think is possible with this scenario
- nathalie: 16:25:52
- we need to choose a point of view camera
- laure.dit: 16:25:54
- hello
- nathalie: 16:25:57
- but
- ideacritik: 16:26:05
- so you want people - do you allow pre-recorded?
- nathalie: 16:26:06
- i'm thinking about other thing now
- nathalie: 16:26:20
- not prerecorded
- nathalie: 16:26:35
- i follow about your question audrey
- nathalie: 16:26:38
- so:
- nathalie: 16:26:42
- for exemple
- Nylon: 16:26:52
- There is a useful acting technique that would help here if we were all aware of it: Sanford Meisner Technique. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meisner_technique
- nathalie: 16:26:53
- act I and II
- nathalie: 16:27:14
- it's only frames 1, 2 and 4 play
- Nylon: 16:27:27
- It is about repitition of what is shown you and emotional reaction
- nathalie: 16:27:54
- so during this time i'm asking if maybe we can draw or send images in other frames 3 & 6
- ideacritik: 16:28:26
- but we cant all send frames to one server simultaneously...
- laure.dit: 16:28:35
- thanks judy
- nathalie: 16:28:45
- only in your frame when you don't play a act
- nathalie: 16:29:10
- a minimal draw or picture around what happens of this act
- ideacritik: 16:29:31
- ah!
- ideacritik: 16:29:45
- i have a concern on my part.
- nathalie: 16:29:47
- or we can keep only the frame empty too
- paula vélez: 16:29:56
- so in act I and II do you want me to send a image in frame 3? but a image without teh character.... wich kind of image?
- nathalie: 16:30:32
- ok :in your frame when
- nathalie: 16:30:37
- you don't play
- Nylon: 16:30:40
- Can drawings/images be stacked in one place and one person be in charge of randomly introducing them to a frame when things are slow?
- nathalie: 16:30:44
- only when you don't play
- ideacritik: 16:31:20
- for my part, if the each act is four minutes - i would be more comfortable to pre-record different actions and then play them in succession as the cue are given from the guests. and i woul dlike to include other footage which obeys the camera angle and so on - as well as the actions...
- nathalie: 16:31:24
- you can send in your frame a picture about a draw you did, or you're doing if you want or a picture
- nathalie: 16:31:41
- no
- nathalie: 16:31:43
- audrey
- nathalie: 16:32:05
- becauseit's more about the idea is a rythm give by the guests
- paula vélez: 16:32:10
- i'm getting it... we are supose to be like avatars. so we must think about clothes too. the other thing... since there is no action of a frame we could think about something in acord with the idea.... but what
- paula vélez: 16:32:19
- let's think about it!
- nathalie: 16:32:23
- i mean when you play again a same action
- ideacritik: 16:32:28
- but i woul d follow their cues - and rythm
- nathalie: 16:32:28
- is not exactly the same
- nathalie: 16:32:55
- because if you observe all actions in a same act are to add
- nathalie: 16:33:06
- actions cumulables en français , sorry
- ideacritik: 16:33:14
- oui oui...
- ideacritik: 16:33:24
- je comprends
- nathalie: 16:33:30
- so if before you have blood you keep blood in your face and then..
- nathalie: 16:33:38
- but maybe not in this order..
- nathalie: 16:33:44
- the guests give the tempo
- nathalie: 16:33:53
- and also order of actions in each act
- ideacritik: 16:33:56
- this will be quite something to coordinate... i mean in terms of me seeing the cues on screen and then the delay of what i am doing finally appearing onscreen....
- paula vélez: 16:34:52
- the other thing is the upload speed
- ideacritik: 16:35:01
- yes... also
- paula vélez: 16:35:02
- instead of reaction
- nathalie: 16:35:03
- a guest can choose during a same act a same action but alternate with other action
- ideacritik: 16:35:29
- as long as they know that more than 3 actions per 4 minutes will result in un-understandable mush...
- nathalie: 16:35:41
- this scenario is think like a script you must to write for an interactive writing..
- paula vélez: 16:35:45
- when guest give an order... it will be some 14 seconds to pass the new action
- nathalie: 16:35:58
- the time is the limit
- nathalie: 16:36:13
- so the guest must follow the frame 5
- ideacritik: 16:36:21
- ok
- nathalie: 16:36:33
- yes he/she don't stay so long time in a same action..
- nathalie: 16:36:41
- because we have a delay
- paula vélez: 16:36:44
- and how we experience before: some old images from last action will apear like little virus
- nathalie: 16:36:51
- and also we need have enough time to play..
- nathalie: 16:36:53
- an action
- ideacritik: 16:37:04
- may i ask about tomorrow's rehearsal? it mentions all day - could this be made a bit more precise?
- nathalie: 16:37:27
- yes old images in loop in each act
- nathalie: 16:37:31
- and between
- paula vélez: 16:37:49
- there is a new patch or are we playing with the same. the last one: beckets
- nathalie: 16:38:09
- so we need to know this time maybe i mean what is the duration of a loop before to actualize totally the screen?
- nathalie: 16:38:37
- for new images play..
- ideacritik: 16:38:56
- oh you mean if its 9, 32 or etc images in the loop?
- nathalie: 16:39:26
- the time
- nathalie: 16:39:37
- sec.
- nathalie: 16:40:22
- to have estimation how much can be an action minimal for the guests
- nathalie: 16:40:33
- the minimal duration
- ideacritik: 16:40:34
- oh... i dont get it... but okey - what about tomorrow? i need to organise the time - i cant be available the whole day - what time is better for you?
- nathalie: 16:40:51
- we need to answer all
- nathalie: 16:40:55
- not me
- ideacritik: 16:41:09
- everyone on this chat you mean or?
- nathalie: 16:41:09
- in mail it was just proposition open to us
- nathalie: 16:41:39
- here we can to think about a time
- ideacritik: 16:41:44
- ah ok - well for me after 11am for sure and for the rest i dont mind as long as it is restraiend to 2-3hours.
- ideacritik: 16:42:01
- i still have to test setup and so on...
- paula vélez: 16:42:30
- tomorrow i could be on line between 13h and 16h30
- paula vélez: 16:42:36
- european time
- nathalie: 16:42:39
- ok
- nathalie: 16:42:54
- so more the afternoon european time ok
- nathalie: 16:42:59
- and other ?
- paula vélez: 16:43:38
- then i could be saturday in the afternoon also
- ideacritik: 16:43:41
- afternoon good with me.
- nathalie: 16:43:47
- ok
- nathalie: 16:43:53
- laure and judy?
- ideacritik: 16:43:54
- saturday afternnoon also fine iwth me.
- Nylon: 16:45:02
- Sat OK for me
- nathalie: 16:45:04
- so I'll send in the mail list the afternoon time around 13h-16h30
- paula vélez: 16:45:11
- so, see you tomorrow. and saturday too
- Nylon: 16:45:13
- Re: sound….I can re-EQ the MP3 I have but do state up front that it is not the quality of recording that we had in the Beckett piano MP3 . It has not the 3D sonic quality of the piano piece, nor the pacing etc. I will do my best and focus on the quality of what goes on top of that.
Re: text I have a couple of ideas that might be written: 1) something on the banality of evil. 2) using cut-up technique, I can read bits from hard boiled detective novels and what we call in English ‘bodice rippers’
Re: sonic samples live….I have a great radio (henry Kloss design) the sound is perfect & there will always be NYC street noise
Just want to get this out to the chat today ‘cause I need time to research and write spoken bits as needed with flexibility - nathalie: 16:45:20
- see you
- nathalie: 16:45:27
- thank judy i read
- paula vélez: 16:45:30
- but tell me. are we going to rehersal with the same patch?
- Nylon: 16:45:51
- OK bye....Nat, you can read and get back to me later. Not to worry
- nathalie: 16:46:02
- i don't know because manuel change the html interface but maybe the same patch yes
- nathalie: 16:46:16
- the last patch yes
- paula vélez: 16:46:44
- ok
- nathalie: 16:47:08
- seems interesting judy
- laure.dit: 16:47:33
- sorry had to leave for some time- ok for saturdaY
- nathalie: 16:47:44
- judy i can upload a best quality of the sound if you want?
- nathalie: 16:47:50
- bye
- paula vélez: 16:47:53
- so see you. and start practicing with meisner technique. thanks judy. ;) (rofl) ;( |( ]:) (doh) (wasntme)
- paula vélez: 16:48:19
- 8-|
- nathalie: 16:48:24
- i have aiff recording for the music if you want?
- nathalie: 16:48:52
- oups judy leave
- paula vélez: 16:48:54
- bye, i must go too. MEISNER TECHNIQUE.
- nathalie: 16:48:57
- ok i'll send her
- nathalie: 16:49:04
- ok bye paula
- nathalie: 16:49:09
- see you
- ideacritik: 16:49:15
- bon a demain!
- nathalie: 16:49:24
- i 'll put this chat in the weblink
- Nylon: 16:49:28
- Don't worry. You have enough to do. I will just re-EQ it in Pro-tools with Jonathan......or just ask him to do it at his house
- nathalie: 16:49:50
- like you want I want to upload this aiff
- nathalie: 16:50:10
- No problem, and you 'll see like you do then.. :)
- nathalie: 16:50:30
- i need to add Jonathan then in the credits of this performance..
- nathalie: 16:50:34
- ok i'll do too
- nathalie: 16:51:56
- do you have questions Judy?
- Nylon: 16:51:59
- Yes, I need 4 hands live to pull this off. He is great. We just got 1 pair of suround sound headphones so we can jump up to do live action sound along with everything else
- nathalie: 16:52:07
- or you want to work and we talk later
- nathalie: 16:52:25
- ok
- Nylon: 16:52:42
- I can wait with my questions until the peices are gathered up for rehursa
- nathalie: 16:52:49
- if you can give me then the name of others people help / work with you the sounds ?
- Nylon: 16:52:50
- OK
- nathalie: 16:52:55
- ok
- paula vélez: 16:53:58
- http://www.imal.org/StreamOnYou/EN.html
- paula vélez: 16:54:36
- nathalie. so now that i will participate, ...
- nathalie: 16:54:45
- i need to ask to manuel if he finished the html interface and 2 interfaces texts html and if we'll use the same link to communicate to the online audience
- paula vélez: 16:54:48
- Æther / performers online
Manuel Schmalstieg (CH), Nathalie Fougeras (FR), Judy Nylon (US), Audrey Samson (NL), Laure de Selys (BE), Lucy Gomez (US), Chloé Kramer (CH), Boris Kish (CH/US), Shelbatra Jashari (ALB) (sound) - paula vélez: 16:54:59
- Paula Vélez (COL)
- nathalie: 16:55:06
- ok thanks
- nathalie: 16:55:21
- i need to actualize all this informations
- ana-lisa: 16:55:46
- Chloé Cramer (with a C)
- nathalie: 16:56:13
- i think the audience html interface is here : http://1904.cc/aether/live/index.html
- nathalie: 16:56:24
- but not ready
- nathalie: 16:56:47
- ok and you're CH or not?
- nathalie: 16:56:59
- Chloé
- paula vélez: 16:57:18
- bye, tnks nathalie
- nathalie: 16:57:24
- ciao
- ideacritik: 16:57:41
- ok salut !
- nathalie: 16:58:07
- bon j'y vais
- nathalie: 16:58:15
- bye all
- nathalie: 16:58:26
- plein de taf
- nathalie: 16:58:32
- see you
- nathalie: 16:59:15
- i send this chat in the web
- nathalie: 16:59:35
- thanks all